Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) is a fascinating way to run an election. The basic idea is that voters rank the candidates and the votes for the least popular candidate are automatically moved to the remaining candidates until one is selected winner.


Ready for the challenge? Code up a solution in your favorite language by midnight Sunday, February 14th, Eastern Standard Time. [ed. looks like we have a deadline error, so hold on to your hats, let us remedy this] Submit it to contest at codetown dot us. Also, post the link or code on this Discussion so the group can see it. We're allowing a little more time for this contest, so the results will be judged by...you! A poll will be posted in Contest Town so you can vote for your favorite app. Maybe we can use IRV to decide?

The winner will receive ... bear with us, as we're waiting to hear back from our sponsor, but this contest is going up now to give you the maximum possible amount of time to code. Good luck!

Views: 950

Replies to This Discussion

features? well, ok. as of the (I swear) final revision (attached here; will also be on my ite space whenever I can access the server): instantrunoff.rar

--it reads ballots in from a file or from command line input. (file format is limited to txt, though.)
--you can vote for as many or as few people on a ballot as you care to. to put it another way, max. votes/ballot is up to you, not me, but you don't have to vote for the maximum.
--no vote is ignored. if your ballot reads MickeyMouse GoofyDog DonaldDuck it'll take that as readily as John Bill Jeff. depending on your point of view, this may not be a feature, but I think write-ins are as American as baseball and apple pie. (Goofy is supposed to be a dog, right?)
--it's verbose. for each round, you see who got the most votes, who was eliminated, and who's left in the runoff.
--it's 93 lines, including liberal commenting.
--it does what it's supposed to.

Michael Levin said:
Update on contest winning entry: Michael, Kevin and Eric, we have not gotten a sponsor for Contest 2 yet, though since we haven't chosen a winner yet, the door is still open. Here's the plan. If we don't get a sponsor by the next GatorJUG meeting, I will choose a prize for the winning entry. I'll continue to search for a sponsor. And, stay tuned for Contest #3! Since all the entries are from GatorJUG members, we'll discuss the conclusion of this contest at the next GatorJUG meeting in March. Sound fair? Let me ask of you that you post the features each of your entries implements here as a comment.
hm. attachment didn't work.
try this.

Michael Newman said:
features? well, ok. as of the (I swear) final revision (attached here; will also be on my ite space whenever I can access the server): instantrunoff.rar

--it reads ballots in from a file or from command line input. (file format is limited to txt, though.)
--you can vote for as many or as few people on a ballot as you care to. to put it another way, max. votes/ballot is up to you, not me, but you don't have to vote for the maximum.
--no vote is ignored. if your ballot reads MickeyMouse GoofyDog DonaldDuck it'll take that as readily as John Bill Jeff. depending on your point of view, this may not be a feature, but I think write-ins are as American as baseball and apple pie. (Goofy is supposed to be a dog, right?)
--it's verbose. for each round, you see who got the most votes, who was eliminated, and who's left in the runoff.
--it's 93 lines, including liberal commenting.
--it does what it's supposed to.

Michael Levin said:
Update on contest winning entry: Michael, Kevin and Eric, we have not gotten a sponsor for Contest 2 yet, though since we haven't chosen a winner yet, the door is still open. Here's the plan. If we don't get a sponsor by the next GatorJUG meeting, I will choose a prize for the winning entry. I'll continue to search for a sponsor. And, stay tuned for Contest #3! Since all the entries are from GatorJUG members, we'll discuss the conclusion of this contest at the next GatorJUG meeting in March. Sound fair? Let me ask of you that you post the features each of your entries implements here as a comment.
I created an instant-runoff Clojure library, which would be useful for someone who is creating an election application (commandline/web/etc) in Java or any other JVM language. It is only 32 source lines of code, not including the "def candidates" and "def votes" statements which were only used for testing. The winner function takes a list of ballots and a set of candidates as input and returns the winner - a simple and orthogonal API.

http://github.com/ericlavigne/instant-runoff/blob/master/src/electi...

The code was written and thoroughly tested in front of a live audience. Unfortunately those tests were in a Clojure prompt and were lost when my laptop batteries died. I have started rebuilding the test suite, as shown in the following file.

http://github.com/ericlavigne/instant-runoff/blob/master/test/elect...
Since I was out of town for the March meeting, let's get together at the April meeting (at the Civic Media Center) to determine a winner.

Michael Newman said:
features? well, ok. as of the (I swear) final revision (attached here; will also be on my ite space whenever I can access the server): instantrunoff.rar

--it reads ballots in from a file or from command line input. (file format is limited to txt, though.)
--you can vote for as many or as few people on a ballot as you care to. to put it another way, max. votes/ballot is up to you, not me, but you don't have to vote for the maximum.
--no vote is ignored. if your ballot reads MickeyMouse GoofyDog DonaldDuck it'll take that as readily as John Bill Jeff. depending on your point of view, this may not be a feature, but I think write-ins are as American as baseball and apple pie. (Goofy is supposed to be a dog, right?)
--it's verbose. for each round, you see who got the most votes, who was eliminated, and who's left in the runoff.
--it's 93 lines, including liberal commenting.
--it does what it's supposed to.

Michael Levin said:
Update on contest winning entry: Michael, Kevin and Eric, we have not gotten a sponsor for Contest 2 yet, though since we haven't chosen a winner yet, the door is still open. Here's the plan. If we don't get a sponsor by the next GatorJUG meeting, I will choose a prize for the winning entry. I'll continue to search for a sponsor. And, stay tuned for Contest #3! Since all the entries are from GatorJUG members, we'll discuss the conclusion of this contest at the next GatorJUG meeting in March. Sound fair? Let me ask of you that you post the features each of your entries implements here as a comment.
My project just ran for real. Some of the students are fussing. It is interesting to read some of thier posts.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Avant-Garde/277009322419?ref=ts

We had 4 parties.
two obviously lost and two where very, very close for winning. The party that had the most number one votes then lost because the party in second place had the most second and third place votes.

very interesting.


Michael Levin said:
Since I was out of town for the March meeting, let's get together at the April meeting (at the Civic Media Center) to determine a winner.

Michael Newman said:
features? well, ok. as of the (I swear) final revision (attached here; will also be on my ite space whenever I can access the server): instantrunoff.rar

--it reads ballots in from a file or from command line input. (file format is limited to txt, though.)
--you can vote for as many or as few people on a ballot as you care to. to put it another way, max. votes/ballot is up to you, not me, but you don't have to vote for the maximum.
--no vote is ignored. if your ballot reads MickeyMouse GoofyDog DonaldDuck it'll take that as readily as John Bill Jeff. depending on your point of view, this may not be a feature, but I think write-ins are as American as baseball and apple pie. (Goofy is supposed to be a dog, right?)
--it's verbose. for each round, you see who got the most votes, who was eliminated, and who's left in the runoff.
--it's 93 lines, including liberal commenting.
--it does what it's supposed to.

Michael Levin said:
Update on contest winning entry: Michael, Kevin and Eric, we have not gotten a sponsor for Contest 2 yet, though since we haven't chosen a winner yet, the door is still open. Here's the plan. If we don't get a sponsor by the next GatorJUG meeting, I will choose a prize for the winning entry. I'll continue to search for a sponsor. And, stay tuned for Contest #3! Since all the entries are from GatorJUG members, we'll discuss the conclusion of this contest at the next GatorJUG meeting in March. Sound fair? Let me ask of you that you post the features each of your entries implements here as a comment.
Dan Lackey said:
My project just ran for real. Some of the students are fussing. It is interesting to read some of thier posts.

Congrats Dan!

Some people are upset about losing, and the new system is an easy scapegoat. Still, even in the losing party there are people saying to stop being so childish. Sounds like it went well.
I have had projects blow up in my face for having mistakes in them before. I have never had one blow up because it was done properly.
Pretty funny really.


Eric Lavigne said:
Dan Lackey said:
My project just ran for real. Some of the students are fussing. It is interesting to read some of thier posts.

Congrats Dan!

Some people are upset about losing, and the new system is an easy scapegoat. Still, even in the losing party there are people saying to stop being so childish. Sounds like it went well.

RSS

Happy 10th year, JCertif!

Notes

Welcome to Codetown!

Codetown is a social network. It's got blogs, forums, groups, personal pages and more! You might think of Codetown as a funky camper van with lots of compartments for your stuff and a great multimedia system, too! Best of all, Codetown has room for all of your friends.

When you create a profile for yourself you get a personal page automatically. That's where you can be creative and do your own thing. People who want to get to know you will click on your name or picture and…
Continue

Created by Michael Levin Dec 18, 2008 at 6:56pm. Last updated by Michael Levin May 4, 2018.

Looking for Jobs or Staff?

Check out the Codetown Jobs group.

 

Enjoy the site? Support Codetown with your donation.



InfoQ Reading List

Presentation: Scaling Cloud and Distributed Applications: Lessons and Strategies From chase.com, #1 Banking Portal in the US

Durai Arasan explains the architectural strategies used to scale Chase.com to 67M+ active users. He discusses achieving high resilience through multi-region isolation, slashing latency by 71% via edge computing, and utilizing automated "infrastructure repaving" to eliminate security drift. He shares vital lessons on self-healing observability and building an engineering-first culture.

By Durai Arasan

AWS Debuts “DevOps Agent” to Automate Incident Response and Improve System Reliability

AWS recently announced the public preview of AWS DevOps Agent, a new "frontier agent" that aims to help organizations react more quickly to production incidents, identify root causes, and proactively strengthen system reliability.

By Craig Risi

Visual Studio 2026 Released with AI-Native IDE and Performance Boost

Microsoft has officially launched Visual Studio 2026 (version 18), marking what they call the first ‘AI‑native’ release of its flagship integrated development environment. The general availability rollout follows extensive validation via the Insiders channel and reflects a blend of performance optimisations, deep GitHub Copilot integration, and tooling updates across core languages and workloads.

By Edin Kapić

Article: NextGen Search - Where AI Meets OpenSearch Through MCP

In this article, authors Srikanth Daggumalli and Arun Lakshmanan discuss next-generation context-aware conversational search using OpenSearch and AI agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) and Model Context Protocol (MCP).

By Srikanth Daggumalli, Arun Lakshmanan

Netflix Migrates to Amazon Aurora: 75% Performance Boost and 28% Cost Reduction

Netflix consolidated its relational databases onto Amazon Aurora, cutting costs by 28% and boosting performance by up to 75%. The move from self-managed PostgreSQL reduced operational toil, improving latency for critical apps. This mirrors migrations by Samsung and Panasonic, though benchmarks suggest alternatives like Timescale may suit specific workloads better.

By Mark Silvester

© 2025   Created by Michael Levin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service